On June 22nd, 2010, sixth-grader Nicole Suriel and her class went on a school trip to Long Beach, Long Island.  Her school, which is located in Harlem, arranged the trip for more than two-dozen children.

Long Beach is a lovely little city on the south shore of Long Island.  It has beautiful beaches and approximately 3 miles of boardwalk on the beaches.  Unfortunately, Nicole’s school did not carefully investigate the situation in Long Beach prior to scheduling the trip.

The children were taken to a beach where no lifeguards were present.  There was too little supervision of the children involved.  In addition, the appropriate permission slips were not obtained for all of the children.

Five Children Almost Drowned

Things went very badly for this school trip. Five of the sixth-graders came close to drowning.  Luckily, four of the students were pulled out of the ocean successfully.  Unfortunately, Nicole Suriel drowned.  Nicole’s parents have brought a civil lawsuit against the City of New York for their negligence in the planning and supervision of this beach excursion.  No matter how much money they collect it, will never bring back their daughter!

Crime is expensive.  The cost of incarcerating individuals is an expense born by society at large.  The State of Missouri is advising judges as to the cost of the prison sentences that they hand out.

In Missouri, when a judge is ready to send someone to jail on a criminal charge, he or she now must take into consideration the resulting cost to the State of Missouri.  Incarcerating individuals is an expensive proposition.  Missouri is now the only state in the country that systematically provides information to all judges with regard to the cost of sentencing the defendants who appear before them to prison time.

Critics of the Missouri system feel that this is an embarrassment for the state.  They claim the cost of punishing individuals who have been convicted of crimes should not be a factor taken into consideration by the court.  They claim society would be at greater risk if the criminals are not incarcerated and that administering justice is a separate issue from the resulting financial impact on society.

Criminal Justice Is Expensive

America is currently engulfed in an economic crisis.  Budgets for court systems have been cut.  Politicians are faced with the task of keeping their citizens safe while making the legal system operate smoothly, efficiently and as inexpensively as possible.

The State of Michigan has closed some of its prisons.  Arizona is currently considering privatizing its correctional facilities.  California, a state in dire financial straights, is investigating all types of ways to reduce the amount of individuals incarcerated within its borders.

The Criminal Justice System In New York

At the present time, the state of New York has significant financial problems.  Each year the legislature fails to pass a budget on a timely basis.  Governor Patterson threatened to lay off workers because the state cannot afford to pay them.

Query: Should judges handing out criminal sentences for individuals convicted of misdemeanors and felonies take in consideration the cost to New York State for keeping those individuals in jail? Should individuals convicted of nonviolent crimes receive alternative sentences to incarceration?

I personally see no harm in providing a judge with the actual cost of sentencing an individual who appears before him or her.  I believe Missouri’s system of providing judges with the cost of the jail terms they hand out to be a good idea.  Incarceration of nonviolent offenders for small, petty crimes is a waste of valuable (and extremely limited) resources!

The state of Florida recently passed a new law that allows municipalities to use red light cameras at traffic intersections.  If the camera catches a motorist going through a red light, a ticket is issued and mailed to the owner of the vehicle. A lawsuit has been brought in West Palm Beach for the purpose of invalidating Florida’s red light camera law.  The lawsuit claims that individuals are innocent until proven guilty and that the red light camera law violates this basic tenant of criminal justice in the United States.

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Individuals caught in the red light camera have to prove in court that they were not driving the vehicle at the time of the incident.  Instead of a individual being innocent until proven guilty, he or she is guilty until proven innocent under the new law. Attorney William Abramson, whic filed the lawsuit on behalf of one of his clients, stated that Florida’s red light camera law violates constitutional rights of individuals.

The Florida law went into effect July 1, 2010.  Under this new statue, the driver of a motor vehicle either pays a $158 fine or has to submit evidence that he or she was not driving the vehicle at the time of incident.  Attorney Abramson claims the driver should not have the burden of proof.  The municipality should have to prove that the owner of the vehicle was the operator at the time of the incident.  The lawsuit claims that “the presumption of guilt, shifting the burden of proof, violates both the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution.”

New York Red Light Cameras

The State of New York has a similar law in place concerning red light cameras.  On Long Island and in the five boroughs of the city of New York, the owners of motor vehicles are regularly receiving traffic tickets based on red light cameras taking photographs of their vehicles at various intersections.  The drivers of the vehicles are not identified.  The New York law similarly places the burden on the owner of the vehicle to prove he or she is not guilty.  This constitutes a violation of the owners constitutional rights.  Under New York State Constitution and the Federal Constitution, individuals are innocent until proven guilty of traffic matters.

Should you, a family member or a friend have issues with red light tickets, speeding tickets or other types of traffic violations, feel free to contact the traffic attorneys at the law office of Elliot Schlissel.  We can help you with these matters. Our phone number is 1-800-344-6431, or contact us by email.

Dog Bite Kills Man

October 22nd, 2010

In February of 2010, Kenneth Bach was at Chain Lake in Monroe, Washington.  While he was there, he was bitten by a red bone hound owned by Konrad Haskins.  Kenneth Bach’s family claims that this red bone hound had a history of attacking and biting people.  At the time of the incident, the dog was not leashed and was roaming freely throughout the facility.

Dog Bites Man On Finger

The hound bit Kenneth Bach on his finger, which began bleeding.  Although the bite did not seem to cause a significant injury at the time of the incident, there were complications that took place the following day when Mr. Bach started to feel pain in his leg.  He went to a local hospital to have the problem checked out.  The doctors at the hospital determined that he had a blood clot. As a result of the blood clot, Mr. Bach developed an infection diagnosed as “capnocytophaga canimorsus”, a type of bacteria that is found in the saliva of cats and dogs.

Mr. Bach Dies

The saliva that went into Mr. Bach’s blood from the dog bite caused a severe infection that resulted in his death.  He died ten days after the incident.

Mr. Bach’s family has sued Conrad Haskins for Bach’s wrongful death.  In the state of Washington, a dog’s owner can be held liable for civil damages if he or she has a dog who is known to be vicious or to attack people.  This is virtually the same standard that exists in the state of New York.

Should you, a family member or loved one be bitten by a dog, you may be entitled to recover monetary damages from the owner.  Feel free to contact the personal injury attorneys at the law office of Elliot Schlissel should you have any questions, at 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

How to Handle a Traffic Stop

October 18th, 2010

The most common interaction that a law-abiding citizen has with police is being stopped pursuant to a traffic violation.  It is important that you do not act in an aggressive or disrespectful manner to the police officer when being stopped.  It is especially important that you do not get into an argument with the officer.  Do not ask “what are you stopping me for?” and do not try to control the situation.  The best way to handle the stop is to be polite, charming and apologetic.  The police officer has stopped you for a reason.  By claiming that you did not do whatever activity he or she witnessed you doing, you are insulting the officer’s intelligence.

Chris Rock’s Advice

Chris Rock has a video on YouTube in which he gives advice about what to do when you get pulled over for a traffic violation.  In the video, Chris Rock recommends that you should “obey the law, stop immediately and stay in your car with your hands on the wheel.  If your woman is mad at you, leave her at home.  There’s nothing she’d like to see more than you getting your ass kicked”.  This is generally good advice!

Honesty is the Best Policy

Do not lie to the police officer when you are stopped.  In addition, do not tell the police officer that you don’t know the reason you were pulled over.  This will not be helpful.  Police officers are concerned with their safety at traffic stops.  They do not know if you are an honest citizen or a hardened criminal with a gun under your seat.  Stay calm!

What to Do When the Officer Approaches the Car

When the police officer approaches your car, remain inside the vehicle.  Turn the interior dome light on in your car and keep your hands on the steering wheel.  It is important that you avoid making quick movements.  A police officer may misinterpret a quick movements being an aggressive action to obtain a weapon.

If the police officer asks you for your license and registration, tell the police officer where you are going to put your hands to try to find these items.  When you move to obtain your license and registration, do not move quickly.  Instead, move slowly in a non-aggressive manner.  If you need to open the glove compartment, ask for the police officer’s permission before doing so.  He or she may be concerned that there is a weapon in the glove compartment.  Be friendly with the police officer.  Do not tell him or her that you have important contacts or that you know a lawyer who will straighten this matter out.  This would be a mistake.  Furthermore, do not, under any circumstances, try to offer the police officer a bribe!

Traffic tickets can be a minor nuisance or they can destroy your livelihood and result in significant hardship by causing you to lose your driver’s license.  Should you be issued a summons for  traffic violation, an experienced traffic court attorney can help you deal with these problems.  Feel free to contact the law office of Elliot Schlissel to assist you in this matter, at 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

Several years ago, Nevada was a state where home prices skyrocketed.  Today, Nevada suffers from one of the highest foreclosure rates of any state in the country.  RealtyTrac.com claims that one out of every eighty-four households in the state of Nevada has received a foreclosure notice.  This is 4.5 times more than the national average.

To deal with the high foreclosure rate, Nevada has implemented a foreclosure mediation program.  The purpose of the program is to get troubled borrowers and lenders to negotiate amicable resolutions concerning foreclosure issues.  The program has been in effect since July of 2009.  As of this date, almost 9,000 mediation requests have been received.  Nevada is currently the only state that requires banks to enter into a mediation program.

Since the mediation process started, in excess of sixty-percent of all foreclosure cases have been resolved through mediation.  Not all of the resolutions resulted in the homeowner keeping their home.  In some cases, as a result of the mediation, the homeowner realized they have no possibility of affording their home and agreed to vacate the premises; however, a large majority of the cases were resolved with the financial institution and the homeowner working out a mortgage modification plan.

New York Foreclosure Defense

The law in New York does not require mediation for foreclosure lawsuits; however, New York Governor David Patterson signed into law a statute that requires mortgage companies, banks and other financial institutions to participate in settlement conferences.

The settlement conferences are required whether or not there are mortgage modifications that are pending.  In most situations where there are mortgage modifications pending, the lawsuit is put in abeyance until such time as there has been a decision made with regard to the mortgage modification.  In many respects, the settlement conferences have a mediation-type of impact due to the fact that the judge will explore alternatives to the case moving forward.

Our law office has been representing individuals with financial problems who face foreclosure and other types of lawsuits for more than thirty years.  Should you have financial problems or find your house in foreclosure, feel free to call us.  There are alternatives to foreclosure and we can assist you with regard to these alternatives.  Contact our office as 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

Do celebrities who have committed misdemeanors and/or felonies receive special treatment? Do they receive special community service? The answer to these questions in the city of New York is that everyone does the same community service.

Caroline Giuliani

Caroline Giuliani, age 21, is the daughter of New York’s former mayor, Rudolph Giuliani.  She was recently charged with shoplifting in New York City, which is a misdemeanor (under New York State law, misdemeanors are punishable by up to one year in prison).  Her attorneys recently worked out a plea-bargain deal on the shoplifting (petit larceny) charge.  The charge will be dismissed if Caroline completes one day of community service and stays out of trouble for a period of six months.

Caroline Giuliani’s attorneys requested that she receive special treatment and that she be able to pick out her own type of community service.  The court refused to allow this.  She will most likely be assigned to the same community service regime that Boy George and Naomi Campbell were subject to.

Boy George and Naomi Campbell

Boy George and Naomi Campbell had been prosecuted in the city of New York for various misdemeanors (criminal matters).  In each of their cases, they were ordered to perform community service.  Boy George advised the court that he would throw a concert in the city of New York and donate all of the proceeds from the concert to the city as his community service. The court said no! Instead, Boy George put on gloves, a face mask, a neon vest and work boots and spent several hours sweeping and cleaning up the corners of the New York City Sanitation Department garage in Manhattan.

Naomi Campbell had some negative interaction with the criminal justice system in March of 2007.  She was convicted of throwing her cell phone (a misdemeanor) at her housekeeper and was sentenced to community service.

Naomi showed up to work wearing stiletto boots.  The former model changed into work boots, a neon vest and a face mask.  She too cleaned and scrubbed the New York City Department of Sanitation garage.

Community Service

Criminal defense counsel in the City of New York, Long Island and Westchester county can work out community service alternatives to criminal sentences.  Community service avoids jail time and probation.

Should you, a loved one or a friend be charged with a criminal matter, feel free to contact the criminal defense lawyers at the law office of Elliot Schlissel.  We can help protect your rights and, in the event that you are convicted of a crime, try to work out a community service alternative to incarceration.  Please contact us at 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

Police Abuse In Newark

October 11th, 2010

There is a problem with the police in Newark.  They are running amuck.  There have been many instances of excessive force, false arrest and other abuses by police officers in Newark.  It has been suggested that these abuses be investigated by the federal authorities and that a monitor be appointed by the federal government to supervise the police department.  These allegations are contained in a proceeding recently brought by a civil liberties group in Newark.

American Civil Liberties Union Takes Action

The lawsuit, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (the “ACLU”), requests that the civil rights division of the justice department take immediate action to supervise the police in Newark.  The complaint by the ACLU documents numerous abuses and inappropriate activities by police officers.  The suit claims that the police operate in a culture of impunity, with few, if any, police officers ever being punished for their misdeeds.  The complaint specifically states that the misconduct “has left citizens dead, permanently injured and otherwise damaged”.  The petition also states that “it has left innocent Newark residents distrustful of the police, unsure whether an encounter with them will lead to being protected and served or beaten and arrested”.

The petition by the ACLU is ninety-six pages long.  It provides detailed information concerning the courts, the police and other U.S. governmental agencies.  The petition goes on to state that the inappropriate actions of certain members of the Newark police department have damaged the careers and harmed the reputation of good, honorable police officers.

The petition indicates that police misconduct has been going for decades.  During the past two and one-half years, more than fifty-one separate lawsuits have been brought against police officers and/or the police in Newark.  These lawsuits deal with issues involving police misconduct, such as beatings, theft, and illegal searches.  The police are committing misdemeanors and felonies.  In cases where citizens have reported police misconduct, there have been threats and harassment by the police against these citizens.

The Newark Police Department has recently settled thirty-eight separate and distinct police misconduct cases.  These settlements have cost the city of Newark approximately five million dollars.

Help Dealing With Police Misconduct

Should you, a family member or loved one be exposed to what you feel is police misconduct, contact the law office of Elliot Schlissel.  We may be able to assist you in obtaining monetary damages for the police misconduct and for the violation of your civil rights.  Contact us at 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

In October of 2003, Kenneth Stevens was charged with robbing one Citibank branch and three branches of Chase Manhattan bank in New York.  Mr. Stevens’s modus operandi in each of the robberies was to give the teller a note demanding money.  The note also stated that he had a bomb with him.

The fourth robbery was his last one.  Several blocks from the bank he was stopped and arrested.  At the time of arrest he was carrying the $4,700 in cash he had taken from the bank.  Unfortunately for Mr. Stevens, he also had a deposit slip that read, “I have a bomb.  Give me all the money”.  Mr. Stevens was also carrying with him a black plastic bag containing a coffee canister, not a bomb!

Trial

Mr. Stevens was represented at the time of his trial by a court appointed attorney named Michael Young.  During the course of the trial, Michael Young had a man named Harvey Alter sit at the defense table.  Mr. Young referred to Harvey Alter as his “associate”.  Mr. Alter was present during the entire course of the trial.  When there were conferences at the bench, he also approached the bench with Mr. Young.  The court was under the impression that Mr. Alter was an attorney.

In September of 2004, the jury found Mr. Stevens guilty.  Judge John F. Keenan of the Southern District of New York sentenced Mr. Stevens to 216 months in jail.

Harvey Alter Was Not An Attorney

After the trial, it was discovered that Harvey Alter was not an attorney.  He was instead a convicted felon and had a business relationship with Michael A. Young, Esq.

Appeal Based On Ineffectiveness Of Counsel

Mr. Stevens brought an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the second department.  He claimed ineffective assistance of counsel.  He further claimed that he was convicted on the felony charge of bank robbery, labeled a career offender and sentenced to eight years in prison due to the fact that his attorney’s associate was a felon.

The court found that even though Mr. Stevens attorney sat next to an individual that was a felon, it did not impact the effectiveness of his counsel.  The court also pointed out that the jury was never aware that Mr. Alter was not an attorney and therefore it had no impact on the jury deliberations.  Unfortunately for Mr. Stevens, he is still stuck in jail!

Should you have questions regarding misdemeanorsfelonies or other criminal matters, free feel to contact the criminal attorneys at the law office of Elliot Schlissel at 1-800-344-6431, or by email.

New York’s Anti-Bullying Law

October 4th, 2010

Imagine that your child  is overweight or has issues concerning sexual orientation.  Your child can be the butt of jokes or bullying by other children.  Children can be cruel to other children.  Facebook and other social media sites allow the posting of cruel articles, nasty pictures and malicious gossip.  There have recently been several situations where children have committed suicide as a result of intimidation and harassment by other children.  The state of New York has now taken action to deal with this issue by passing an anti-bullying law.
The new statute requires school districts to protect children against bullying.  Specifically, it requires schools to deal with bullying based upon a child’s sexual orientation or weight.
Schools Responsibilities

Schools are now responsible for guarding children against discrimination and harassment related to both ethnicity and disability.  The DIGNITY FOR ALL STUDENTS ACT was signed into law by Governor David Paterson on September 8, 2010.  This statute, which provides protection for trans-gender students, is one of the first state statutes of this type.
Codes Of Conduct
The effect of the new statute is to cause  school districts to amend their codes of student conduct.  Guidelines must also be established for school employees.  The school districts will have to create employee sensitivity programs to deal with the new requirements.
Each and every school will be required to have a staff member fully-trained in counseling methods.  This new statute is in addition to any existing New York State and New York City anti-discrimination laws.
Protecting Children
Children need to be protected.  This is a good step in that direction.  In a civilized society, the strong should not be allowed to take advantage of the weak!